For the protection of our patients, the staff will wear mask in the office.
For Telehealth follow-up and new consultations please contact us Here
1-818-812-7222 Office Hours: Monday and Wednesay 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM
10 Congress St., Suite #405
Pasadena, CA 91105

Category: RNY

Neuromuscular Disease After Weight Loss Surgery

June 08, 2015 11:30 am

Weight loss surgical procedures may result in varying degrees of nutritional deficiencies. Some of these nutritional deficiencies may cause neuromuscular disease if left untreated, these include vitamins, minerals, and protein. The long-term effect of these deficiencies may presents as neuromuscular conditions including, weakness, numbness, confusion and all others if not-diagnosed and untreated. It is important to note that all weight loss surgical procedures require lifetime vitamin, mineral supplements and protein monitoring and possible supplements.

The table below outlines some of the specific neurological and neuromuscular disease complications following bariatric surgery. The most common deficiencies seen with the duodenal switch operation are fat soluble vitamin deficiencies. These include, Vitamin A, D, E and K. Duodenal Switch patients need oral supplements of Dry “Water Miscible” type of Vitamin A, D, E, and K based on their laboratory studies and needs.

Screen Shot 2015-06-07 at 1.46.20 PM
Click on the picture to enlarge
Screen-Shot-2015-06-07-at-1.46-min
Click on the picture to enlarge

The neurological deficiencies are manifested much more frequently with the Gastric Bypass than the duodenal switch operation. The most common nutritional deficients are that of B1, B12, Folate deficiencies that are common in Gastric Bypass. A list of possible neurologic deficiencies and there associated symptoms were summarized by Becker (2012). Another article with Nutritional Neuropathies.

Nutritional deficiencies are seen in a number of illnesses including weight loss surgery patients.

Dental Issues after Weight Loss Surgery

October 13, 2014 10:53 pm

Please click the link to view the webinar on Dental Issues after Weight Loss Surgery.  A special thank you to Armen Mardirossian, DDS, MS Diplomate for his contributions to this article.

Update for Feb. 2017 Dental Resources here.

Dental Issues after Weight Loss Surgery Webinar here.

alveolar-bone
Anatomy of a Tooth
Dental Issues after Weight Loss Surgery
Factors that contribute to Dental Issues

This is a review of data regarding weight loss surgery and dental health.  I am not a Dentist so please follow up with your Dental Health Care Providers if you are having any issues.  Always keep your health care providers informed of your overall health status.

Bowel Obstruction After DS

August 20, 2014 12:47 am

One of the potential complications of any abdominal surgery is Bowel Obstruction.  If the treating physician (usually the primary care, or the emergency room doctor) is not absolutely clear of the anatomy of a patent post duodenal Switch or the Gastric bypass  surgeries this will pose a diagnostic dilemma. In intact anatomy the GI tract start at the mouth and ends up at the rectum as a long tube. After the Duodenal Switch the small bowel has two parallel limbs, the alimentary limb brings the food down from the stomach, and the biliopancreatic limb brings down the biliopancreatic secretions. These two limbs join and form the common channel.

In normal anatomy, bowel obstruction may present with nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, inability to pass gas, and/or have bowel movements. In this case, the X-ray will also show dilated loops of bowel and if oral contrast is given with the X-ray, there will be no contrast past the obstruction. Think of it as a garden hose that has been kinked and no water is going thru.

Bowel Obstruction After DS
Bowel Obstruction After DS

In this upper GI- the contrast travels down the small bowel and the entire small bowel is the same caliber. This is normal study with no evidence of obstruction. In a patient with the DS, the patient my have the biliopancreaitc limb obstruction, with an identical X-ray as above, since the oral contrast given will never get to the biliopancreatic limb and it will not show if it is dilated or not. 

In duodenal switch operation, a patient may have complete obstruction of the alimentary limb, with nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, and yet have bowel movements because the content of the biliopancreatic limb is getting to the common channel. Similarly, a patient with biliopancreatic limb may have nausea, but no vomiting, because the obstructed biliopancreatic limb is not connected to the stomach and the content can’t not be expelled from the stomach.

Bowel Obstruction After DS
Bowel Obstruction After DS

It is critical to make sure that a patient with a suspected bowel obstruction after the DS, is evaluated with the understanding that the common signs and symptoms, and the diagnostic workup will not provide an accurate picture. A patient with the DS or RNY, can have bowel obstruction and still have bowel movement, and no vomiting.

Bowel Obstruction After DS
Bowel Obstruction After DS

A patient with suspected bowel obstruction should have CT scan of the Abdomen with oral and IV contrast. The cardinal findings will be “dilated loops of bowel with no contrast within the lumen of the bowel”. This is highly suspicious for bowel obstruction after DS, where the regular x ray will not pick this up. Additionally, abnormal liver function test may suggest biliopancreatic limb obstruction.

Bowel Obstruction After Duodenal Switch

August 19, 2014 4:47 pm

One of the potential complications of any abdominal surgery is Bowel Obstruction.  If the treating physician (usually the primary care, or the emergency room doctor) is not absolutely clear of the anatomy of a patent post duodenal Switch or the Gastric bypass  surgeries this will pose a diagnostic dilemma. In intact anatomy the GI tract start at the mouth and ends up at the rectum as a long tube. After the Duodenal Switch the small bowel has two parallel limbs, the alimentary limb brings the food down from the stomach, and the biliopancreatic limb brings down the biliopancreatic secretions. These two limbs join and form the common channel.

In normal anatomy, bowel obstruction may present with nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, inability to pass gas, and/or have bowel movements. In this case, the X-ray will also show dilated loops of bowel and if oral contrast is given with the X-ray, there will be no contrast past the obstruction. Think of it as a garden hose that has been kinked and no water is going thru.

Bowel Obstruction After DS
Bowel Obstruction After DS

In this upper GI- the contrast travels down the small bowel and the entire small bowel is the same caliber. This is normal study with no evidence of obstruction. In a patient with the DS, the patient my have the biliopancreaitc limb obstruction, with an identical X-ray as above, since the oral contrast given will never get to the biliopancreatic limb and it will not show if it is dilated or not.

In duodenal switch operation, a patient may have complete obstruction of the alimentary limb, with nausea, vomiting and abdominal pain, and yet have bowel movements because the content of the biliopancreatic limb is getting to the common channel. Similarly, a patient with biliopancreatic limb may have nausea, but no vomiting, because the obstructed biliopancreatic limb is not connected to the stomach and the content can’t not be expelled from the stomach.

Bowel Obstruction After DS
Bowel Obstruction After DS

The images of fluid filled loops of bowel are highly suspicious.

Bowel Obstruction After DS
Bowel Obstruction After DS

It is critical to make sure that a patient with a suspected bowel obstruction after the DS, is evaluated with the understanding that the common signs and symptoms, and the diagnostic workup will not provide an accurate picture. A patient with the DS or RNY, can have bowel obstruction and still have bowel movement, and no vomiting.

A patient with suspected bowel obstruction should have CT scan of the Abdomen with oral and IV contrast. The cardinal findings will be “dilated loops of bowel with no contrast within the lumen of the bowel”. This is highly suspicious for bowel obstruction after DS, where the regular x ray will not pick this up. Additionally, abnormal liver function test may suggest biliopancreatic limb obstruction.

Does Size Matter

September 28, 2009 12:14 pm

The scientific basis for weight loss surgery, for the majority of the part relies on the premise that overeating and lack of exercise are the principal mechanisms contributing to the increase in the incidence of obesity over that last decade. Much has been said about our unhealthy life style that involves sedentary activity and immobility. Fast foods, high fat content meals, calorie dense food, are some of the examples of possible contributing factors to this health crisis.

The contrary position would be that there are other factors that contribute to obesity. These may include environmental factors, food preservatives, genetics, and exposures to toxins.

If one assumes that the over eating is the core problem, then you can also assume that the most successful operation will have the smallest stomach, since it will reduce the ability to over eat most drastically. This is where the scientific evidence does not support the theory and we all have to reassess the principal that the treatments are directed toward.

Recently there have been a number of studies that have been published in scientific journals that suggest size of the stomach or the pouch does not matter. So if obesity is the result of over eating then the operation that provides the smallest stomach must work the best. This argument should be true for the pouch size after gastric bypass, and the opening of the gastro-jejunostomy (connection between the stomach pouch and the small bowel connected to it after the gastric bypass, RNY operation). The same theory applies to the sleeve gastrectomy of the duodenal switch operation.

This argument that over eating and lack of exercise is the major contributing factor seems to be loosing ground.

The studies below are outline to demonstrate the disparity between the theory and the lack of scientific support for it.

1- Sanchez-Pernaute et.al. (Obesity Surgery, 17, 2007) reported that “After DS, gastric tube volume is not directly related to weight changes.” He proposed that there are other factors that may contribute to the weight loss than the size of the gastric tube.

does-size-matter-01
does-size-matter-01

This graph taken from the referenced study above shows that the size of the stomach sleeve does not correlate with the %EBWL in DS patients. The smaller stomach sleeve does not result in the more weight loss.

2- O’Connor et.al. (SOARD 4(2008)399-403) reported that “With construction of divided, vertical, lesser curve-based small-volume (=<20cm3) gastric pouches, the actual size of the gastric pouch did not correlate wit the %EBWL at 1 year after Laparoscopic, GB [gastric bypass]”.

3- Nishie et.al. (Obesity surgery, 17, 2007) concluded that “pouch size area, measured by routine UGI [upper GI series] on the first post operative day, does no influence short-term postoperative weight loss”.

does-size-matter-02
does-size-matter-02

This a sample of a number of graph that Nishie published in her study. The similar graphs were for 3, 12, and 24 months. They all had a flat line distributions. What they are showed was regardless of the time lapsed from surgery, the %EBWL was independent of the size of the pouch measured immediately post operatively.

4- Cottam et.al. (Obesity Surgery, 2009, 19:13-17) reported “The level of restriction or the presence of stenosis achieved by different circular stapler sizes does not have a significant role in weight loss”.

does-size-matter-03
does-size-matter-03

This study was focused on the size of the opening that is made between the stomach pouch and the small bowel in the gastric bypass (RNY) operation. The weight loss did not differ in the two groups of the patients. One group had a 21mm stapler and the other one 25mm stapler used. The weight loss, as measured by %EBWL was nearly identical in both cases.

In summary, the size does not seem to matter. The size of the stomach pouch, when it gets to a certain size in not important. The smaller stomach pouch or the narrower connection of the stomach and the small bowel will not make a patient loose more weight. Doesn’t this prove, to at least some degree, that there is much more to obesity than the simple notion of eating small portion and exercising?