Our office is located at 5170 Sepulveda Blvd., Suite 210, Sherman Oaks, CA 91403. We accept select PPO insurance plans. For appointments and telehealth consultations, contact us.
1-818-812-7222 Office Hours: Monday Thru Friday: By Appointment only
5170 Sepulveda Blvd. Suite 210
Sherman Oaks, California 91403

Blog

The truth about gastric bypass is out!

January 21, 2011 12:28 pm

By Charles Bankhead, Staff Writer, MedPage Today
Published: June 26, 2009
Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine and Dorothy Caputo, MA, RN, BC-ADM, CDE, Nurse Planner

DALLAS, June 26 — Patients who undergo gastric bypass surgery often have undiagnosed glucose abnormalities that can lead to bad eating habits and regained weight, a small clinical study suggests.

Almost 80% of the patients had glucose abnormalities, including hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, or both, Mitchell Roslin, MD, of Lenox Hill Hospital in New York, reported here at the American Society of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery meeting. Patients were alarmed by the weight regain, but at the same time, they often had a ravenous appetite soon after a meal, accompanied by an almost uncontrollable urge to eat.” Our hypothesis is that . . . patients may have an enhanced insulin response,” said Dr. Roslin. “They have rapid emptying of the pouch that leads to reactive hypoglycemia. The combination of an empty pouch and low blood sugar leads to hunger.” The findings have led him to question whether gastric bypass surgery should remain the gold standard procedure for treating obesity, he added. At the very least, surgeons should consider the possible need to include a valve in gastric bypass.

The study evolved from clinical observations during patients’ periodic postoperative visits. A growing number of patients complained of weight regain and loss of restriction. The complaints often had a common ring.” Patients were saying that one or two hours after eating, they were ravenously hungry,” said Dr. Roslin. “It sounded a lot like hypoglycemia to me.” To investigate the origin of the symptoms, Dr. Roslin and colleagues studied 63 patients who had undergone gastric bypass procedures. All the patients had a 100-g glucose tolerance test, wherein the maximum/minimum glucose ratio was assessed one to two hours after the glucose challenge.The investigators defined reactive hypoglycemia as a glucose value <60 mg/ dL, or a decrease of 100 mg/dL or more within two hours and no glucose value exceeding 200 mg/dL. They defined hyperglycemia as any value >200 mg/dL and no value <80 mg/dL. Follow-up from surgery averaged about four years. The mean age of the group was 48.5, and 81% were women. The patients’ average preoperative weight was 138 kg, with an average body mass index of 49. One-third had preoperative diabetes. The percentage of excess BMI lost averaged 55%, and the patients had regained an average of 12 kg. Glucose tolerance tests showed six patients with hyperglycemia, including five who had normal fasting blood glucose levels. In addition, 35 patients had reactive hypoglycemia, while eight had hyper- and hypoglycemia. “The hyperglycemic cohort was characterized by a rapid rise to high sugar levels,” said Dr. Roslin. “The fact that most of these patients had normal fasting glucose means we need to be very careful of what we call cure or control of diabetes.” Reactive hypoglycemia manifested as a rapid upsurge of glucose levels that correlated with a rise in insulin and then a rapid decline during the second hour after the glucose challenge. Patients with both hyper- and hypoglycemia had even more pronounced swings in glucose and insulin levels, said Dr. Roslin.

The most dramatic rises and falls in blood glucose have been associated with small pouches and wide anastomoses, he added. The findings suggest a need to consider alterations in the standard gastric bypass procedure, such as use of valves, or possibly abandonment of the procedure in favor of another approach. “I believe that vertical-sleeve gastrectomy and duodenal switches that are not severely malabsorptive will be the best options in the future,” said Dr. Roslin.

Editorial: The about article was sent to me by Vicki Blackburn- Thank you Vicki. This was one of the many presentations that was made at the ASMBS meeting held in Dallas. I will be sharing other presentation in the future newsletters. This article describes what those if us that have been preforming duodenal switch operation have knows for years. This explains why the size of the pouch does not matter, that dumping does not protect against weight gain and why duodenal switch operation is far better option that the alternatives. As with other procedures the science will eventually shed light on all the facts. Dr. Roslin indicates the time is now to consider what should be the benchmark standard for weight loss.
Ara Keshishian MD, FACS

Vitamin A

January 01, 2011 1:42 pm

Benefits of Vitamin A

– It is crucial for the proper utilization of protein. – It is stored in the liver and it helps purify the bloodstream. – It helps maintain healthy skin and is used in the treatment of acne. – It prevents night blindness and is prescribed for eye disorders. – It protects the body from bacterial and viral infections. – It keeps skin and tissues healthy. – It is thought to be of value in retarding cancer growth. – It helps to maintain healthy thyroid balance.

Best Absorbed Form

Retinol; retinyl palmitate and retinyl acetate.

Take With

B complex, vitamin D, vitamin E, calcium and zinc (since zinc gets vitamin A out of its storage deposits)

Don’t Take With

Iron, copper, phosphorus, magnesium or calcium When zinc is combined with certain foods it may not be absorbed into your body. Avoid the following foods for approx 2 hours after you take zinc: bran, fiber-containing foods, whole-grain breads and cereals, and phosphorus-containing foods such as milk or poultry.

Information on Vitamin A

Two of the most common vit A sources are retinol and beta-carotene. Retinol is sometimes called “true” vit A because it is nearly ready for the body to use. Principle forms of retinol in supplements are retinyl palmitate and retinyl acetate. Beta-carotene is a precursor for vit A. The body needs to convert it to retinol for use so as a result it is preferable to supplement with retinol sources. According to the AACE/TOS/ASMBS Guidelines [55] for post-op Duodenal Switch patients with deficiency symptoms, aggressive oral supplementation, up to 65,000 IU/day of vitamin A, can normalize dark adaptation and the serum vitamin A level after 2-3 months. Check with your surgeon for the suggested post-op daily supplementation.

For more information on Vitamin A

Vitamin A: The Vitamin That Helps Reduce Sun-Related Skin Damage 

Zinc

January 01, 2011 1:39 pm

Benefits of Zinc

– Plays a role in immune function, protein synthesis, wound healing, DNA synthesis, and cell division. – Plays an important role in the immune system, which may explain why it is helpful in protecting against infections such as colds. – Plays a role in the regulation of appetite, stress level, taste, and smell. – It is essential for normal growth and development.

Best Absorbed Form

Chelated zinc gluconate

Take With

Take with food if needed, zinc can be hard on your stomach.

Don’t Take With

Iron, copper, phosphorus, magnesium or calcium When zinc is combined with certain foods it may not be absorbed into your body. Avoid the following foods for approx 2 hours after you take zinc: bran, fiber-containing foods, whole-grain breads and cereals, and phosphorus-containing foods such as milk or poultry.

Information on Zinc

Zinc is an essential trace mineral, which means that it must be obtained from the diet since the body cannot make enough. A daily intake of zinc is required because the body doesn’t have a zinc storage system. Zinc is eliminated in stool and is dependent on fat for absorption. [55] As a result it can be assumed that due to the larger and more frequent stools following DS increase zinc loss, and thus increase supplement requirements. [66] Research has shown that less than 50 mg a day is a safe amount to take over time. There has not been a lot documented on what happens if more is taken over a long period. Taking more than 150 mg per day may interfere with the body’s ability to use other minerals. [67]

Relationship Between Zinc and Copper

A strong relationship exists between zinc and copper. Too much of one can cause a deficiency in the other. Long-term use of zinc (including zinc in a multivitamin) should be accompanied by copper. For every 15 mg of zinc, include 1 mg of copper. [67] High doses of zinc may lower HDL (“good”) cholesterol and raise LDL (“bad”) cholesterol. This may be due to a copper deficiency brought on by the long-term use of zinc. [67] Copper is also needed to help your body use iron.

For More Information on Zinc

www.drugs.com University of Maryland Medical Center  National Institute of Health 

Probiotic

November 12, 2010 7:58 pm

The term “probiotic” is getting much attention in professional circles as well as in the advertising media but is still poorly understood by many. The term describes beneficial bacteria that are added to our diet to help populate our digestive system with a healthy population of good bacteria. It is becoming ever clearer that a healthy population of bacteria is very important for our overall health. Our gut is the most intimate contact between the interior of our body and the outside world much as our skin is. The gut must remain permeable to nutrients which we absorb from foods yet impermeable to invading bacteria and viruses. The bacterial population of our gut plays important roles in both of those functions. It is also very important in the function of our overall immune function. I will leave that for another time. The purpose today is to discus the use and function of probiotic products.

The human gut is populated by tens of billions of bacteria of a yet to be discovered number of species. In excess of six hundred have already been isolated and identified. Some of these species are beneficial, some are harmful and some are a bit of both. Unfortunately modern society tends to have a negative impact on the health and balance of the members of the probiotic population. Chlorinated water, antibiotics both as medications and in our food and even our food choices can cause an imbalance in this population. When this balance is severely disrupted it is termed “Disbiosis”. A disbiotic gut is not a happy thing. We perceive this disbiosis as digestive symptoms of some sort. We may have gas and bloating, constipation or diarrhea, or even both or all of the above. One of the unfortunate aftereffects of having bariatric (weight loss) surgery is it can allow the gut to become disbiotic more easily.

In the DS gut food reaches the large intestine far more nutrient rich than in the “normal” gut. This provides the population of bacteria living there much more food. Given more food the population can flourish. If this population is out of balance it is even more sensitive to poor food choices thereby making the symptoms of this imbalance even worse. This is why the DS patient needs to make prudent food choices and may well enjoy great benefit from proper doses of high quality probiotic products containing the correct species.

The problem is that not all probiotic products are what they say they are and not all probiotic products have the same species. Add to that the fact that each gut is individual. We may need to do some experimentation to find the right combination of dose and product.

Some people have what I term a McDonald’s mentality. A Big Mac in one town is exactly the same as one from a different town or, as another example, a gallon of Shell unleaded gasoline is essentially the same as a gallon of gas from the Chevron station. This is not the case with probiotic products. Some products contain only one species and some contain thirteen or more. These various species, with one exception fall, into two large groups these are Lactobacillus species which predominate in the small intestine and Bifidobacterium species which predominate in the large intestine. The one exception is actually not a bacterium at all but rather a specific yeast. This yeast is very important and beneficial. It is called Saccharomyces boulardii. Some patients have reported good results with single species products such as Align (B. infantus), Culturelle (L. rhamnosus) or Floristor (S. boulardii). My feeling is that these products are overly expensive as they are heavily advertised and that cost is built into the price. They also tend to be rather low dose.

We also need to address the correct dosage. It is important to read the label. Minimum “therapeutic” dosage is thought to be 20 billion colony forming units (CFU’s). I personally am using 50 billion CFU’s per day as maintenance. I have taken as much as 200b CFU’s per day. I am also aware of research going on that also is looking at similarly high dosage.

I think a good product to start with is “Primal Defense Ultra”. Make sure it is the “Ultra” as it is the stronger blend. It is reasonably priced and contains a total of 13 species including the very important S. boulardii. For DS patients experiencing a disbiosis creating very foul flatus and stool. This species as an ingredient is very important. The S. boulardii has very specific activity against some of the nastiest bad guys in our gut such as Clostridium difficile, Candida albicans and even Entameba histolytica and Giardia lamblia which have been shown to enhance the effectiveness of conventional therapy for these conditions. In less severe cases the probiotics alone may be sufficient to correct the disbiosis but more severe cases antibiotic therapy may be indicated.

As stated previously the dosage needs to be sufficient. Three caps per day of Primal Defense Ultra (PDU) is a commonly used dose. This provides a total of 45b CFU’s with 12b of that total as S. boulardii. This was the dose used in a recent case study looking at DS patients with recurring frank C.diff treated with antibiotic and S. boulardii. Statistically very significant benefit was shown.

Also as stated previously every gut is different. Some may do well on small doses and some may need more. Every patient needs to find the dose that works for them. We need to start slowly and work up. Some increase in gas and bloating may occur. Once the disbiosis is improved patients can experiment with different blends. It is suggested that there be several species of both the lacto and bifido groups. The only allergic reaction I have heard of is one patient who developed a slight rash which subsided after lowering the dose. You can find this is most health food stores but it is a much better deal on line. Typically about 90 caps for $37 vs. 218 caps for about $50. General rule of thumb is that the refrigerated brands are superior to the less expensive freeze dried ones. But, many do well with the less expensive brands. Again, you need to experiment.

Also as stated prudent food choices are extremely important. Things like lean protein, complex carbohydrates and whole grains. Avoidance artificial sweeteners and simple sugars and white flour are all prudent decisions.

 

By: David Caya, DC

Duodenal Switch for Super Morbid Obesity

November 06, 2010 1:43 pm

Clinical data addressing Duodenal Switch for super morbid obesity (BMI > 50). Outcome of laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity.  Magee et al. Oct 2010 PubMed Abstract BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic duodenal switch (LDS) as a treatment option in a selected group of patients with morbid obesity. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a prospective database assessed the frequency of all complications and alterations in weight, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidity and quality of life. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent LDS between April 2003 and March 2009. Median preoperative weight was 160 kg and median BMI 55 kg/m2. All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The in-hospital mortality rate was zero. No ileoduodenal anastomotic stenosis was encountered. There were four clinical leaks (3.3 per cent) managed by laparoscopic drainage and placement of a feeding jejunostomy. Median percentage excess weight loss was 75 per cent at 12 months and 90 per cent at 24 months. Thirty-six of 40 diabetic patients had complete resolution of diabetes within 1 year. There were significant improvements in other obesity-related co-morbidity. Only a few patients developed postoperative protein deficiency, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies were easily managed with oral supplementation. CONCLUSION: The LDS procedure is a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity and its associated co-morbidity in selected patients. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic gastric bypass versus laparoscopic duodenal switch for superobesity.  Søvik et al. Feb 2010 PubMed Abstract  BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (LDS) are surgical options for superobesity. A randomized trial was conducted to evaluate perioperative (30-day) safety and 1-year results. METHODS: Sixty patients with a body mass index (BMI) of 50-60 kg/m(2) were randomized to LRYGB or LDS. BMI, percentage of excess BMI lost, complications and readmissions were compared between groups. RESULTS: Patient characteristics were similar in the two groups. Mean operating time was 91 min for LRYGB and 206 min for LDS (P < 0.001). One LDS was converted to open surgery. Early complications occurred in four patients undergoing LRYGB and seven having LDS (P = 0.327), with no deaths. Median stay was 2 days after LRYGB and 4 days after LDS (P < 0.001). Four and nine patients respectively had late complications (P = 0.121). Mean BMI at 1 year decreased from 54.8 to 38.5 kg/m(2) after LRYGB and from 55.2 to 32.5 kg/m(2) after LDS; percentage of excess BMI lost was greater after LDS (74.8 versus 54.4 per cent; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: LRYGB and LDS can be performed with comparable perioperative safety in superobese patients. LDS provides greater weight loss in the first year. Registration number: NCT00327912 (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov). Copyright (c) 2009 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Duodenal switch provides superior resolution of metabolic comorbidities independent of weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or = 50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass.  Prachand et al. Feb 2010 PubMed Abstract  OBJECTIVE: Increased body mass index is associated with greater incidence and severity of obesity-related comorbidities and inadequate postbariatric surgery weight loss. Accordingly, comorbidity resolution is an important measure of surgical outcome in super-obese individuals. We previously reported superior weight loss in super-obese patients following duodenal switch (DS) compared to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in a large single institution series. We now report follow-up comparison of comorbidity resolution and correlation with weight loss. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing DS and RYGB between August 2002 and October 2005 were prospectively collected and used to identify super-obese patients with diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Ali-Wolfe scoring was used to describe comorbidity severity. Chi-square analysis was used to compare resolution and two-sample t tests used to compare weight loss between patients whose comorbidities resolved and persisted. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty super-obese patients [DS (n=198), RYGB (n=152)] were identified. Incidence and severity of hypertension, dyslipidemia, and GERD was comparable in both groups while diabetes was less common but more severe in the DS group (24.2% vs. 35.5%, Ali-Wolfe 3.27 vs. 2.94, p<0.05). Diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia resolution was greater at 36 months for DS (diabetes, 100% vs. 60%; hypertension, 68.0% vs. 38.6%; dyslipidemia, 72% vs. 26.3%), while GERD resolution was greater for RYGB (76.9% vs. 48.57%; p<0.05). There were no differences in weight loss between comorbidity “resolvers” and “persisters”. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison to RYGB, DS provides superior resolution of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in the super-obese independent of weight loss. Duodenal Switch Operative Mortality and Morbidity Are Not Impacted by Body Mass Index.  Buchwald et al. Oct 2008 PubMed Abstract  OBJECTIVE: This report examines the up to 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity in our first 190 duodenal switch (DS) patients. BACKGROUND DATA: DS is the most weight loss effective and the most difficult to perform bariatric procedure. Indeed, certain surgeons have advocated a 2-stage approach to minimize complications, especially in the super obese (body mass index [BMI] >/=50 kg/m). METHODS: DS procedures were performed (n = 190) by either open (n = 168) or laparoscopic/robotic surgery in an academic setting: common channel 75 to 125 cm, sleeve gastrectomy (approximately 100 mL gastric pouch), closed duodenal stump, end-to-side duodenoileostomy hand-sewn in 2 layers, with most staple lines oversewn, and all mesentery defects closed. RESULTS: For the 190 patients, 149 were female (78%) and the mean age was 43 years (range, 16-71). Mean preoperative weight 151.4 kg (range, 74.1-332.7); mean preoperative BMI 53.4 kg/m (range, 32-107), with 100 (52.6%) of the patients super obese (BMI >/=50 kg/m). Seventy-four patients had concurrent procedures, eg, cholecystectomy (n = 22), ventral or umbilical hernia repair (n = 19), and hiatus hernia repair (n = 10). Mean operating room time was 337 minutes (range, 127-771); mean hospitalization time was 6 days (range, 2-38). There were no deaths. Serious /=50 kg/m (NS). Surgical site infections occurred in 7 patients with a BMI <50 kg/m and in 12 with a BMI >/=50 kg/m (NS). Overall complication rate in patients with a BMI <50 kg/m was 14.4% (13 of 90) and 24% (24 of 100) with a BMI >/=50 kg/m (NS). CONCLUSIONS: With attention to careful surgical technique, DS can be performed relatively safely in the morbidly and super morbidly obese, and does not require a 2-stage procedure. Outcome of duodenal switch with a transitory vertical gastroplasty, in super-super-obese patients in an 8-year series.  Di Betta et al. Feb 2008 PubMed Abstract  BACKGROUND: In super-super obese (SSO) patients [body mass index (BMI) superior of 60 kg/m2] results of bariatric surgery are still controversial. This study evaluated safety and efficacy of open duodenal switch associated with transitory vertical gastroplasty (DS-TVG) after 8 years of follow-up. METHODS: A prospective observational study of 32 SSO patients who underwent an open DS-TVG from January 1999 till March 2006 was performed. Study endpoints included preoperative comorbidities [diabetes, hypertension, and obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS)], postoperative morbidity and mortality, and long-term results of BMI and percent of excess weight loss (%EWL) (median 48 months). RESULTS: Results in terms of BMI and %EWL were, respectively, after 12 months, 46.3 +/- 10.2 and 57.1 +/- 9.8; after 36 months (n = 21), 37.5 +/- 7.5 and 73.5 +/- 6.2; and after 84 months (n = 5), 31.7 +/- 2.8 and 76.0 +/- 4.1. With regard to comorbidities, we observed complete control of lipid alterations and type-2 diabetes (suspension therapy within 1 year). All patients with OSAS improved within 1 year without needing domiciliary oxygen therapy. Neither malnutrition nor mortality was observed during the follow-up. Major complications occurred in a total of 5 patients (15.6%): pulmonary embolism (2 cases-9.4%); gastrointestinal bleeding, requiring transfusions (1 case-3.1%); 1 case (3.1%) of abdominal rupture; and 1 case of acute pancreatitis (3.1%). Minor complications occurred in 4 patients (12.5%): 1 case of pneumonia, 1 urinary tract infection, and 2 wound infections. CONCLUSION: Although this study evaluated the outcomes of a small series of patients after open DS-TVG, this procedure seems to be safe and effective in obese patients who have a BMI greater than 60 kg/m2. In our opinion, DS-TVG should be considered as a valid surgical option with two staged laparoscopic procedures. Duodenal Switch Provides Superior Weight Loss in the Super-Obese (BMI >50kg/m2) Compared With Gastric Bypass  Prachand et al. Oct 2006 PubMed Abstract  Full Article  OBJECTIVES: Although weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is acceptable in patients with preoperative body mass index (BMI) between 35 and 50 kg/m, results from several series demonstrate that failure rates approach 40% when BMI is > or =50 kg/m. Here we report the first large single institution series directly comparing weight-loss outcomes in super-obese patients following biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (DS) and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB). METHODS: All super-obese patients (BMI > or =50 kg/m) undergoing standardized laparoscopic and open DS and RYGB between August 2002 and October 2005 were identified from a prospective database. Two-sample t tests were used to compare weight loss, decrease in BMI, and percentage of excess body weight loss (% EBWL) after surgery. chi analysis was used to determine the rate of successful weight loss, defined as achieving at least 50% loss of excess body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 super-obese patients underwent DS (n = 198) or RYGB (n = 152) with equal 30-day mortality (DS,1 of 198; RYGB, 0 of 152; P = not significant). The % EBWL at follow-up was greater for DS than RY (12 months, 64.1% vs. 55.9%; 18 months, 71. 9% vs. 62.8%; 24 months, 71.6% vs. 60.1%; 36 months, 68.9% vs. 54.9%; P < 0.05). Total weight loss and decrease in BMI were also statistically greater for the DS (data not shown). Importantly, the likelihood of successful weight loss (EBWL >50%) was significantly greater in patients following DS (12 months, 83.9% vs. 70.4%; 18 months, 90.3% vs. 75.9%; 36 months, 84.2% vs. 59.3%; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Direct comparison of DS to RYGB demonstrates superior weight loss outcomes for DS.

Laparoscopic Duodenal Switch

November 06, 2010 12:43 pm

Studies on the laparoscopic Duodenal Switch procedure. Outcome of laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity.  Magee et al. Oct 2010 PubMed Abstract BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic duodenal switch (LDS) as a treatment option in a selected group of patients with morbid obesity. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of a prospective database assessed the frequency of all complications and alterations in weight, body mass index (BMI), co-morbidity and quality of life. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-one patients underwent LDS between April 2003 and March 2009. Median preoperative weight was 160 kg and median BMI 55 kg/m2. All procedures were performed laparoscopically. The in-hospital mortality rate was zero. No ileoduodenal anastomotic stenosis was encountered. There were four clinical leaks (3.3 per cent) managed by laparoscopic drainage and placement of a feeding jejunostomy. Median percentage excess weight loss was 75 per cent at 12 months and 90 per cent at 24 months. Thirty-six of 40 diabetic patients had complete resolution of diabetes within 1 year. There were significant improvements in other obesity-related co-morbidity. Only a few patients developed postoperative protein deficiency, and fat-soluble vitamin deficiencies were easily managed with oral supplementation. CONCLUSION: The LDS procedure is a safe and effective treatment for morbid obesity and its associated co-morbidity in selected patients. Copyright © 2010 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Clinical application of laparoscopic bariatric surgery: an evidence-based review.  Farrell et al. May 2009 PubMed Abstract  BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of U.S. adults are obese. Current evidence suggests that surgical therapies offer the morbidly obese the best hope for substantial and sustainable weight loss, with a resultant reduction in morbidity and mortality. Minimally invasive methods have altered the demand for bariatric procedures. However, no evidence-based clinical reviews yet exist to guide patients and surgeons in selecting the bariatric operation most applicable to a given situation. METHODS: This evidenced-based review is presented in conjunction with a clinical practice guideline developed by the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES). References were reviewed by the authors and graded as to the level of evidence. Recommendations were developed and qualified by the level of supporting evidence available at the time of the associated SAGES guideline publication. The guideline also was reviewed and co-endorsed by the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery. RESULTS: Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for severe obesity, producing durable weight loss, improvement of comorbid conditions, and longer life. Patient selection algorithms should favor individual risk-benefit considerations over traditional anthropometric and demographic limits. Bariatric care should be delivered within credentialed multidisciplinary systems. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RGB), adjustable gastric banding (AGB), and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD + DS) are validated procedures that may be performed laparoscopically. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) also is a promising procedure. Comparative data find that procedures with more dramatic clinical benefits carry greater risks, and those offering greater safety and flexibility are associated with less reliable efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic RGB, AGB, BPD + DS, and primary LSG have been proved effective. Currently, the choice of operation should be driven by patient and surgeon preferences, as well as by considerations regarding the relative importance placed on discrete outcomes. Laparoscopic Technique for Performing Duodenal Switch with Gastric Reduction  Rabkin et al. April 2003 PubMed Abstract  Full Article  BACKGROUND: The duodenal switch procedure with gastric reduction (DS) is a hybrid procedure for morbidobesity that combines moderate intake restriction with moderate malabsorption. This report describes the laparoscopic hand-assisted technique for the duodenal switch procedure (LapDS). METHODS: Restriction is achieved via a greater curvature gastrectomy, reducing gastric capacity to 120ml. The malabsorptive component is constructed by dividing the duodenum 4 cm distal to the pylorus and anastomosing the proximal duodenum to the distal 250 cm of ileum. The biliopancreatic limb is anastomosed to create a 100 cm common channel. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, cholangiogram, liver biopsy and appendectomy are performed in conjunction with DS. RESULTS: 345 LapDS procedures (27 lap-assisted; 318 hand-assisted) were performed betweenSeptember 1999 and February 2002. There were 299 women and 46 men with a mean age of 43 years(range 19-67 years). Mean BMI was 50 (range 36-118 kg/m2). Mean operating time was 201 minutes (range 105-480). The median length of hospital stay was 3.0 days (range 2-22 days, excluding one outlier). There were 7 conversions to open laparotomy, 14 reoperations, and 21 readmissions. There were 3 pulmonary emboli, 2 deep venous thromboses, and 4 perioperative proximal anastomotic strictures. There were no deaths. Mean percent excess weight loss at 6, 18, and 24 months was 51%, 89%, and 91%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic assisted duodenal switch procedure can be performed safely with acceptable operative times and without excess morbidity or mortality. Early Results of Laparoscopic Biliopancreatic Diversion with Duodenal Switch: A Case Series of 40 Consecutive Patients.  Gagner et al. Dec 2000 PubMed Abstract  Full Article  BACKGROUND: Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS) is an operation which provides one of the greatest maintained weight losses of any bariatric procedure. We looked at the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic BPD-DS for morbid obesity. METHODS: A 150-200 ml sleeve gastrectomy was created and anastomosed to the distal 250 cm of divided ileum. The median length of the common channel was 100 cm. All patients were prospectively followed up to 12 months. RESULTS: 40 consecutive patients underwent laparoscopic BPD-DS as a primary procedure for morbid obesity. Median patient body mass index (BMI) was 60 kg/m2 (range 42-85 kg/m2). Mean age was 43 +/- 1 years (+/- SEM), with 12 males and 28 females. One patient was converted to open laparotomy (2.5%). Median operative time was 210 +/- 9 minutes (range 110-360 minutes) with a significant correlation between BMI and operative time (p = 0.04). Median length of stay was 4 days (range 3-210 days). There was one 30-day mortality (2.5%). Major morbidities occurred in 6 patients (15%), including 1 anastomotic leak (2.5%), 1 venous thrombosis (2.5%), 4 staple-line hemorrhages (10%) and 1 subphrenic abscess (2.5%). Median follow-up at 6 months (range 1-12 months) resulted in 46% +/- 2% excess weight loss (EWL) and at 9 months 58% +/- 3% EWL. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic BPD-DS is a complex, yet feasible, procedure resulting in effective weight loss with an acceptable morbidity. A BMI >65 was associated with increased morbidity and mortality. A long-term study is needed to confirm efficacy and proper patient selection.

Protein

October 23, 2010 6:33 am

More than 10,000 different proteins make a person what they are. Protein is found throughout the body–in muscle, bone, skin, hair, and virtually every other body part or tissue.  

Complete vs. Incomplete Protein

There are 20 amino acids that are the building blocks for all protein. The body can make eleven of them (non essential) and the remaining nine need to be taken in, which come from the diet (essential). Complete protein sources contain all the amino acids needed to build new proteins. Animal protein sources (meat, fish, poultry, milk, cheese, and eggs) are usually complete. Gelatin is the only incomplete animal protein. Soybeans are the only plant protein considered to be a complete protein. [37] Proteins lacking one or more essential amino acids are called incomplete proteins. Beans, grains, nuts, fruits and vegetables tend to be incomplete proteins. Incomplete proteins can be combined (by consuming different protein sources) to make complete protein. It was believed that these foods had to be eaten at the same time in order to be used by the body to build protein. Studies now show that the body can combine complementary proteins that are eaten within the same day. [38] Examples of combining incomplete proteins include: macaroni and cheese; yogurt with granola; peanut butter and toast. A patient needs a daily supply of amino acids to make protein because the body doesn’t store amino acids like it does fats or carbohydrates. If protein is not consumed in the diet, the body will use the only available source – muscle tissue – to get what it needs. Less muscle tissue further contributes to a slowed metabolism, and reduced fat-burning.  

Recommended Dietary Allowance (RDA) for Protein

The Institute of Medicine recommends that adults get a minimum of 0.8 grams of protein for every kilogram of body weight per day, for an unstressed body, to keep the body from slowly breaking down its own tissues [39]. That’s about 8 grams of protein for every 20 pounds of body weight. RDA of protein for women ages 19-70 is 46 grams per day. [39] RDA of protein for men ages 19-70 is 56 grams per day. [39] It has been estimated that Duodenal Switch patients’ malabsorption is 40% of their protein intake. As a result, surgeons generally recommend a daily protein intake of 80-120 grams to their post-op patients. [41-43], [51] The additional protein is also required any time the body is stressed above the baseline. This includes any illness, trauma, injury and post surgical state.  

Protein Content in Food

protein chart

Protein Supplements

For most post-operative patients, after DS, it may be nearly impossible to get the required protein in by the means of meals. If patients are not able to get their daily protein requirements through their diet they should use protein supplements. Supplemented protein is bio available and is absorbed extremely quickly. Look for protein supplements that are low in carbohydrates. There are numerous protein supplements available commercially and IT is best to rotate the types of protein used.

Myth or Fact: Can 30 grams of protein be absorbed at a time?

Does a person with an unaltered anatomy only absorb 30 grams of protein at a time? There is some scientific data to support this position. However it requires extrapolation of data. In a study [73] that when two groups of patients were given two different amounts of protein (30 grams and 90 grams), the amount for protein utilization as indirectly measured by muscle production (reflecting the ability to absorb protein and utilize it) did not increase or correlate with the amount of protein taken. The study concluded that it is probably more important to consume small volumes of protein more frequently versus a few meals with large protein content.

Bioavailability of Protein Types

Bioavailability refers to the protein’s ability to be used by the body and it is measured by Biological Value (BV). The higher the BV, the more bioavailable the protein. The BV numbers below demonstrate how easily the body (pre-DS) can absorb these protein types. The last few protein types mentioned on the list would need to be blended to make a complete protein. Whey blended products, BV 100-159 Whey, BV 104 Egg, BV 100 Cow’s milk, BV 91 Egg white, BV 88 Beef, BV 80 Fish, BV 79 Chicken, BV 77 Casein, BV 77 Soy, BV 74 Potato, BV 71 Rice, BV 59 Wheat, BV 54 Beans, BV 49 Peanuts, BV 43 Post DS patients need to keep in mind that they do not absorb protein from food as well as an individual with a un-altered GI anatomy. Pre-digested (hydrolyzed) protein supplements (like whey) are more highly absorbed and help our bodies get the proper nutrients we need. Make sure the protein powder or drink states that it is pre-digested or hydrolyzed, and the best kind of protein would be a whey blend protein. Second best would be a 100% whey protein. Isolates, though good for a quick acting pick-me-up, are not sufficient alone for post-op DS patients on-going maintenance requirements.  

Protein Supplement Recommendations

Protein supplement preferences vary person to person. If possible try samples of the supplement before investing in a large container. Also, your tastes before and after surgery may differ, so wait until you are post-op before sampling. When post-op Duodenal Switch patients were asked about their favorite protein shake here are the overwhelming reported top 3 and how the nominators make it.   Champion Nutrition Pure Whey Stack Chocolate – Put 1.5 scoops in 4-5 oz. water, shake well, and serve over ice. – Simply mix it with a fork with cold water and add ice. – In a blender mix 1 cup of milk or water, 1 heaping tsp of instant coffee, 2 scoops of protein powder, 4 ice cubes. – Mix it with ice and water, or ice and soy milk in a magic bullet for a shake! – Shake 6-8 oz. water   Champion Nutrition Pure Whey Stack Banana Scream – Milk, whole banana, ice = Milk Shake. – Put 1.5 scoops of protein in 6oz Lactaid Milk, blend well in Magic Bullet, and serve over ice. – 2 scoops powder, 2 c. crushed ice, 1 c. half & half – all whizzed up to milkshake consistency in my blender.   IDS Multi-Pro Whey Vanilla-Cinnamon – Mix slurry 1 1/2 scoops of protein powder in 4 oz. of cool water and 2 oz. of 1/2 & 1/2. Pour hot coffee into the slurry and stir. – A “glop” of DaVinci sugar free caramel sauce + 8 oz. water + ice, blended. – 1/2 cups half & half, 1/2 cup Oregon Chai Tea (I use slightly sweet but there is also sugar free), 1 scoop IDS Cinnamon Vanilla. Heat half & half with Oregon Chai until luke warm. Stir in powder, heat in 20 seconds intervals until hot.   For Vitalady’s Protein Comparison Chart: Protein Comparison Chart

Carbohydrates

October 23, 2010 6:31 am

A sugar molecule is the basic building block of every carbohydrate. The body uses carbohydrates to break it down to glucose (blood sugar), which is the source energy for the cells, tissues and organs of most living things. The glucose can be used immediately or stored in the liver and muscles to be used later, when needed. The most common forms of carbohydrates are sugars, starches and fibers. Starch carbs are found in all cereal grains, as well as roots and tubers. Starchy foods include: bread, pasta, rice, noodles, couscous, tapioca, potatoes, sweet potatoes and yams. Dietary fiber carbs are found in most plant foods, like fruits, vegetables, legumes and whole grain cereals. The digestive system handles all carbs in the same way – by breaking them down into single sugar molecules so they are small enough to absorb into the bloodstream. Fiber is an exception because it can’t be broken down into sugar molecules by the human digestive enzymes and as a result passes through the body undigested. Simple carbs are digested very quickly whereas complex carbs take longer to digest and are usually packed with fiber, vitamins and minerals. There are two types of dietary fibers: soluble (dissolves in water) and insoluble (doesn’t dissolve in water). Soluble fiber binds to fatty substances in the intestines and carries them out as a waste and insoluble fiber helps push food through the intestinal tract, which promotes regularity and helps prevent constipation. Soluble fiber is found in the following: oatmeal, oat bran, nuts and seeds, most fruits (e.g., strawberries, blueberries, pears, and apples), dry beans and peas. Insoluble fiber is found in the following: whole wheat bread, barley, brown rice, couscous, bulgur or whole grain cereals, wheat bran, seeds, most vegetables, and fruits. Digestible or Net Carbs It is common to see the phrase “Digestible Carbs” or “Net Carbs”. This refers to the total amount of carbs in a particular food that can be absorbed and digested in the intestinal tract, which excludes dietary fiber, as they cannot be digested. Sugar alcohols are carbs that we do not completely absorb. The most common ones are sorbitol, xylitol, mannitol, and maltitol. These sugar alcohols can cause increased bloating, gas and diarrhea since the unabsorbed components end up fermenting in the intestine. Sugar alcohol has also been advocated as a low calorie sweet substitute. One unique beneficial side effect of the Xylitol is it inhibits bacterial growth in the mouth, and reduces the chance of tooth decays. The easiest way to calculate the net carbs in a food is to subtract the dietary fiber and sugar alcohol content from the total carb content. Example: Total Carbs: 30g Dietary Fiber: 5g Sugars: 1g Sugar Alcohol: 15g Net Carbs: 10g (30 – 5 – 15 = 10)   Also, remember that in general not to eat carbs before bedtime as it triggers insulin and this initiates fat storage, which is probably counterproductive when it comes to weight loss.  

A DS Carb Primer

By Kelly L. All carbohydrates (carbs) begin digesting in the mouth when it comes in contact with the enzyme amylase. Even complex carbs begin the process of breaking down into simpler types at this point. Since monosaccharides need no further digestion to be absorbed, the body begins absorbing, a very small percentage of the total, them as soon as they hit the mouth. Enzyme activity continues in the stomach but it is slowed by the contact with stomach acids. When carbs enter the small intestines this is where DS may assist in preventing some absorption of the more difficult to digest polysaccharides (starches). This reduced absorptive capacity is because of the separation of the secreted enzymes by the pancreas and the liver, from the food that is being delivered for breakdown. A type of enzyme, amylase, is secreted by the pancreas into the duodenum that cuts carbs down into simple sugars. As it passes further, more enzymes break the carbs down into even smaller bits until they are eventually converted to glucose and absorbed by the mucosa lining, villi, of the small intestinal walls. Because of the switch portion of the DS, the amount of time that a polysaccharide is in contact with pancreatic enzymes is reduced. This is probably why many people have gastrointestinal issues when eating starches. Also, glucose is absorbed by the villi in the intestine, so those with shorter common channels and those earlier out will also absorb less. As the body adjusts to the DS, a patients villi becomes thicker and more efficient to counteract the malabsorption; this may be a component of some weight regain years after DS.  

Carbs and Gas

By Diana C. Fruits comprise simple carbs (primarily fructose, which is a monosaccharide and doesn’t have to be digested at all) so they are fully absorbed in the small intestine, and fiber, which is indigestible by both our guts and our bacterial symbionts. Flour products contain starches, which are made up of long chains of monosaccharides — thus, polysaccharides — which are only partially digestible by our rearranged guts with the diminished contact with digestive enzymes. This results in some of the starch ending up in the colon where it is digested by our bacterial symbionts to produce gas. The more whole grain-y the complex carbs we put in our guts, the higher the fiber (indigestible) to starch ratio, and the less likely to cause issues. Other things that cause gas are specific starches that are indigestible in our guts, which our colon bacteria are happy to process, such as raffinose, inulin (the offensive starches in beans, broccoli, etc.) and retrograded starch, which is caused by cooking then cooling of amylose. The primary starch in white flour products, which produces a form of amylose is indigestible in our small intestine, but can be digested by our colon bacteria. This of course is a worse problem for DS patients who digest starches even less than others. For more information on gas and flatulence-producing foods: Natural Gas: Myths and Facts  

More Information on Carbohydrates

Artificial Sweeteners and Cancer: Questions and Answers

Weight Loss

October 23, 2010 6:27 am

Weight loss after surgery can be very dramatic. The fastest rate of weight loss will happen during the first 3 months after surgery. After the Duodenal Switch patients can expect to lose 0.5 to 1 lb. per day or 40 to 90 lbs. by 3 months post-op. [51] Rapid weight loss decreases by 6 to 9 months after the procedure and peak weight loss is achieved at 12 to 18 months post-op. For some, getting rid of weight daily becomes an obsession after surgery. The weight may fluctuate up or down on a daily basis. Moreover, the weight loss may not be constant and regular. Do not be alarmed with the small weight gains or lack of weight loss over a short period of time. The best advice is to get weighed 1-2 times a month at the follow-up with a doctor. If a patient is a member of any surgery support forums they will probably be comparing their weight loss with others. IT is important not to compare weight loss rates among other patients. There are a wide number of variables that may not be known, all of which are factors specific to a patients weight loss rate. As we said above, in the first 3 months a patient can lose anywhere between 40 to 90 lbs. That is a very big range..

It’s not POUNDS, it’s PERCENTAGES!

By Carolyn M. Two people, both 6 months post-op. One has lost only 63 pounds and feels bad about her “slow” weight loss. The other has lost 96 pounds and thinks she’s doing great. They are both wrong. Person A had only 105 excess pounds, so she has already lost 60% of her excess weight. She is actually ahead of the game at 6 months out and is on track to lose it ALL. Person B had 265 excess pounds. At 6 months out she has only lost 36% of her excess weight. At this rate, she will end up retaining 28% of her excess weight, enough to keep her in the obese category. What this means is that the percent excess weight loss is a much more critical number than that absolute number of pounds lost. Percent of excess weight lost: pounds lost divided by total excess pounds. Use a BMI of 30 as a goal weight. Please note: These are averages. A patient’s individual weight loss will be different.

Weight Loss Goals for the Super Morbidly Obese

By Amanda L. – DS Pediatric Endocrinologist For some of the super morbidly obese (BMI 50+) the goal of 100% of estimated weight loss cannot be achieved without the plastic-reconstructive surgery. My plastic surgeon prefers people to be at 90% of estimated loss before extensive lower bodywork. Not only that but she required you to be at a stable weight for 6-9 months.